Every person , whether natural or juridical depend redress in the hooks of law for the imposition of justice in each given situation . The court represented by the venture is seen as the final arbiter who puts an end to whatsoever given controversy where some(prenominal) parties lay down their positions and arguments and leaves it up to the judge to decide on the matter based on an fair game and not subjective attitudeI agree with the above credit that a strong work of loyalty should be employ hardly when it is clean that the parties agree on it . When there is clear reason to the contrary , the courts should not obligate the parties to perform any profession not agreed upon by the partiesIt would be an shabbiness to delineate a caller who is not in harmony with the bid of the case to act in accordance with a duty not agreed upon by them .

This will direct to speculations of the court acting in a biased elbow agency since it would often result to a case where the other society is forced to perform something favorable to the other . The courts should weigh every circumstance by listening and asking for evidence from two parties with equal opportunities given on twain sides . It would be huffy to force the other party to act in mansion with an alleged agreement where the evidence clearly points to the fact that such(prenominal) was not freely and voluntarily agreed upon by both partiesIt would however...If you want to get a fu ll essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper